Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Euro Coins

Euro Coins

 * Reason:Very high quality of Euro coins and fits all the criteria.
 * Articles this image appears in:Euro Euro coins
 * Creator:?

MER-C 08:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Bewareofdog 04:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral I like the image and it is high quality, but I would find it much more fitting in an encyclopedia if none of the coins were cut off, though it is a small portion in this image, I would rather see each completely. -- Will Mak  050389  04:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose - the compositing was done very clumsily. Some of the drop shadows are cut off, the shadows weren't masked for transparency above the other coins, simply cut off of a light background, and there are huge artifacts in some of the shadows - which seems strange considering the coins themselves are pretty good looking. Debivort 05:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Debivort. Making a composite of overlapping images is not as simple as cut and paste. The obvious layers shown by shadows suddenly cut off along a straight line make this look very unprofessional. J     Are you green? 05:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Debivort. Loses enc because coins cover one another. --Janke | Talk 06:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose unfortunately, per the above. It wasn't put together properly. -- Phoenix  (talk) 07:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose very poorly done composite image. -- Pharaoh Hound  (talk)   (The Game)  11:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per all above.--HereToHelp 14:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak support - Rowing against the flood... I like the composition and technical quality is quite good. Showing the whole coins is not necessary IMO. Alvesgaspar 17:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Opposers are right, quality is not good enough - Alvesgaspar 01:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Support This is excellent! Neutral slightly leaning towards support That close-up changed my mind! ♠   Tom   @  s   Bat   18:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment people seem not to be noticing what seem like blatant flaws to me. Here is a blow up. I should have also added that the shadows have different hues for some reason too. Debivort 19:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)