Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/European Parliament delist

European Parliament
Composition isn't bad but the image quality is pretty poor - oversaturated, oversharpened and heavily shadow/highlighted, with significant artifacts particularly in the trees and around the sculler. The building isn't going anywhere, so there's not really any excuse for featuring a picture of this quality.


 * Nominate for delisting --YFB ¿  18:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist, the oversharpening is horrific. If you look at the original you can see why -- it was blurry to start. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I have to admit that the digital version is not a really good quality. Last time I had to face the fact that automatically digitized slides could not compete with images done with digicams.  Today I would not put the image on the FPC list any more Andreas Tille, author


 * Keep Well, it has mostly good quality. And it is significant. Sharkface217 19:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it more significant than any other picture someone could go and take any day of the week? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Go today and make a comparable photo (and no, I would not use this as an argument to keep a photo with technical constraints in FP). Andreas Tille, author


 * Delist artificial sharpening reduces effective resolution and damages appearance, you cannot get information that is not there, this is not CSI. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 23:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist Way oversharpened, low quality, etc... Inklein 02:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep All I need to say.... Booksworm Talk to me! 15:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist per nom. --KFP (talk | contribs) 18:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist and get another shot of it. Witty lama 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist for reasons stated by nom. --Bridgecross 20:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Delisted Raven4x4x 05:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)