Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/F-15 Eagle

F-15 Eagle
Pretty simple. An F-15 Eagle. Striking/beautiful/fascinating/etc. - BRIAN 0918   05:20, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Nominate and support. - BRIAN 0918   05:20, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Nice shot! TomStar81 05:39, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Fantastic! --Fir0002 07:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Wow ! JoJan 10:12, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Very impressive.  Could use a caption in the article, though the source doesn't give much to go on.  (Here's a link to the relevant back issue.  Interesting reading.) &mdash;Korath (Talk) 11:25, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * I did some research, and have a bit more infromation, I will be updating the picture. PPGMD 15:00, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Are you sure the photo is by that person? I know that's what it said in the back issue, but I thought they were talking about the photo OF the back cover, not the photo ON the back cover. Do staff sargents normally go up in planes and take pictures? No clue.  -- BRIAN 0918   15:05, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * If the Staff Sargent's role is as a photographer, he typically does up on a regular basis. And here's where is says, that he took the photo PPGMD 15:15, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

+12 / 0 -- Solipsist 16:05, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, that's what I call striking! Mgm|(talk) 21:16, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Neutralitytalk 07:53, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * support --SPUI (talk) 08:38, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Beautiful. --Spangineer &#8734; 20:13, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose I'm surprised that no one has complained that the horizon isn't flat ;-) Well alright support - the horizon is about 5° off, but it doesn't really bother me that much. I dare say the F-15 can climb vertically even if this one isn't quite managing it. -- Solipsist 07:46, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Very good pic. --Electricmoose 17:17, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Incredible! --rlwelch

