Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Facial Markings, Siberian Tiger

Facial Markings, Siberian Tiger



 * Nominate and support. -  Tewy  01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm trying out the format of the Bales of hay nomination by Ravedave because I think it will make things a lot easier to tally, but others may think differently. Opinions are needed! Please leave a comment here on what you think. Thanks. -- Tewy  02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Creator: Crushinator
 * Nominator:  Tewy 
 * Date Submitted: 01:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Subject: I think this an excellent photograph (size, DOF, etc.) that illustrates the markings on a tiger's face.
 * Support Votes:
 * 1) Nice clear shot showing details of a tiger face; adds to article. (BTW, for those that have so far voted on 'Bales of Hay' - note that under this format I do not need to restate my support/oppose as it is covered by the subheading; I just need the reason) --jjron 10:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Preference for edit. --jjron 09:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC).  Make that Edit 2 - even better; in fact, lots better. --jjron 11:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) A very exceptional image. The image is clear and well focused; I especially like how this rare Tiger is facing the camera. (Also: Can the voting format of this nomination be discontinued; its very busy) -- AJ24 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Does anyone else notice the overall red color cast? I uploaded an edit, which I support.  howch e  ng   {chat} 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Edit 2 only. Great photo, but lacking in sharpness. Fixed that in Edit 2. Dislike the cold colors of Edit 1 --Fir0002 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) In doubt about what it should look like, support original. Edit 2 looks oversharpened to me, and edit 1 too cold indeed. --Bernard 03:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Edit 2. Good DOF, encyclopedic, composition, and the edit has good sharpness. -- Pharaoh Hound   (talk)  18:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Edit 2. --Vircabutar 02:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Edit 2. nice color and composition. -Ravedave 02:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Edit 2. Exceptional image. I also like the colors and composition. But how about a complete tiger? - anyway, this one is just good! Mikeo 19:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Edit 2. Sharpness, color and just plain beauty. I really like this picture.
 * Oppose Votes:
 * 1) What a shame, a lovely pic spoilt by the very slight blur - Adrian Pingstone 20:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Weak oppose - Aperture too wide open. Due to this most of the facial features are not in focus. WB in edit 1 seems to be closest to the original. Other two are too warm IMO. Great subject and composition. - doniv 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral
 * 1) reason - user
 * comment
 * Questions:
 * question - user
 * comment

Mikeo 21:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)