Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:199 - Buenos Aires - Aéroport international Ezeiza - Janvier 2010.jpg

Ministro Pistarini International Airport
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 11:59:07 (UTC)
 * Reason:Informative and impressive panorama
 * Articles in which this image appears:Ministro Pistarini International Airport, Airport check-in, Buenos Aires, Transport in Argentina
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:S23678


 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Nicely stitched. The 180-degree view clearly has distortions but they suit the geometric nature of the subject. Colin°Talk 18:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Outstanding image, feels like you're there. At full resolution, a couple people appear slightly blurred since they were probably moving, but it's not distracting and makes sense technically. —Eustress talk 19:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * support solid as far as I can tell.©Geni 22:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose I think this is pointlessly wide. I'd much prefer a rectilinear stitch of the centre part of this image. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - I think the width is to allow us to see both sides. Having travel flashbacks now cuz of this pic. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Per above. Very impressive. There is a small fish eye effect, but it doesn't matter too much. Dusty777 (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose - agree with JJ Harrison. I don't like these distorted images, and I can't make out what it's showing. MathewTownsend (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose The picture is very impressive and has a good EV, but (per JJ harrison) the stitching in the center of the picture does need some repair. It kinda looks like the left and right sides of the pictures angle towards the center. Dusty777 (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose - nice, but agree with JJ Harrison too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. I'm not bothered by the distortion as much as I am by having that center arch cut off slightly ... it's a little distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. Fish-eye doesn't bother me. I've looked and looked, and can't find the stitching error JJH is talking about. Clegs (talk) 12:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Can someone point out where he said there was a stitching error? Seems to me he only said that the wrong stitching technique had been used. --jjron (talk) 13:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose agree that the excessive distortion is distracting, confusing and unnecessary. -- ELEKHHT 00:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)