Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbotsbury, Dorset, UK - May 2012.jpg

Abbotsbury, Dorset, UK
Voting period ends on 31 May 2012 at 10:48:38 (UTC)
 * Reason:It's very high resolution, detailed and aesthetically pleasing, showing clearly both the surrounding landscape and the village itself, from the best available vantage point at St Catherine's Chapel.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Abbotsbury
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:User:Diliff


 * Support as nominator -- &#208;iliff   &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  10:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support good EV, clear photo, large image. What camera did you use? Pine(talk) 19:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice. Camera type should be in the metadata (see Commons page) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually because this is a stitched panorama, the Camera metadata seems to be stripped. It's a 2x8 segment panorama taken with a Canon 5D Mk iii and 70-300mm f/4-5.6L lens at about 90mm. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  09:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (In case u don't know the tool) I use Exiftool to copy EXIF from an image to another afterwards when they get lost in the process (for example when I have to call enblend manually). You could copy the EXIF from one of the source image to the panorama. My guess is that u keep same settings for the source pics, so it's relevant. Hugin, which I use, copies these EXIF data, and adds the resulting FOV in a free comment field, but only calls Exiftool. - Blieusong (talk) 11:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Nice lighting and conditions. Very sharp and all... the MKIII delivers :) - Blieusong (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Lovely picture and great detail. In addition to the existing geoposition, I think it would be useful if you could describe your position in the image-description page and also in the article picture caption (e.g., "Panorama of the village, as viewed from the south-west at St Catherine's Chapel.", if those details are all correct). Colin°Talk 08:17, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Done. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  12:44, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - Quite nice. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent clarity. -- ELEKHHT 22:39, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support superb quality. Outstanding detail and resolution. Excellent composition. Purpy Pupple (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 20:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)