Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthochaera chrysoptera.jpg

Little Wattlebird

 * Reason:I was really pleased with this shot, the quality is good and the bird really pops at full size, not so good at thumb size though.
 * Articles this image appears in:Little Wattlebird, Corymbia ficifolia
 * Creator:Noodle snacks


 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 12:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Great capture, setting is perfect, interesting view/angle, really adds to the article. Nice bird too... hang on, I think I've got a wattlebird somewhere... mikaultalk 12:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose The background is extremely distracting and much of the bird is covered up by the flowers. Overall it is a good shot, but it fails to highlight its intended target. -- mcshadypl T C  21:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose I'm sorry, but I agree with Mcshadypl on this photograph. Pastor Theo (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support not much of the bird is covered (the tips of the wing and tail) and the flowers are both striking (HBW quality) and highly encyclopaedic. It is a honeyeater, it eats flowers! (Or nectar, you know what I mean). Sabine's Sunbird  talk  23:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Mcshadypl. --Eustress (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Mcshadypl.  Zoo Fari  02:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

A pity almost no one bothered to view it at bigger than thumbnail size, take into account this image's usage within the article or consider its encyclopaedic value. It is a sunken ship now though. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose Bird is partially obscured, and those cool-looking flowers are too distracting! Sasata (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)