Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Apis mellifera Tanzania.jpg

Apis mellifera

 * Reason:Good quality and EV. Much better then the current FP
 * Articles this image appears in:Honey bee, Forage (honey bee), Pollen basket, European honey bee
 * Creator:Muhammad


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 07:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Agree that the quality is better of yours than the existing FP, but the existing FP has better colour (yours is quite monochromatic) and a more interesting composition. I think there's room for both, though. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I don't like the dull flash lighting and colours. Composition is not the best either. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What do yo mean by dull flash lighting? --Muhammad (talk) 21:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The picture shows little volume, everything looks like projected in a flat surface. Look at this old FP: small and not technically perfect but a far better composition and lighting. A little advice, if I may: since you have already dominated most of the essential macro technique, I think you should now invest on composition and aesthetics, that is were some of your photos fail. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose Lighting could be better, but I really think 1250x1250 is a bit small for a very common subject. I wonder about the white balance too, the specular highlights are yellow, not white as you'd expect. Noodle snacks (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1250x1250 is abt 1.6mp, what Fir usually uploads. If it were to make your vote change, I can upload a higher res. --Muhammad (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 03:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)