Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangalore Panorama.jpg

Bangalore Panorama
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2012 at 19:28:45 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality, resolution and EV. The only pano in the article. Image has been stable for some time now. There may be a few distractions but getting a good vantage spot is extremely difficult.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Bangalore
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Can't see any reason to oppose, other than possibly a little dark... If the claims about the poor vantage point are correct then I don't believe we are easily able to get better than this... gaz hiley  09:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. I know how hard it can be to find good vantage points. This one is pretty good though, showing a variety of districts, and giving a sense of architecture and layout. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  15:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment You might want to check at leaning to the left issue. I noticed it even on the thumbnail (thought it was me but then checked closely and found it to be real indeed, see right side). Seems good otherwise to me. - Blieusong (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Edit 1 Uploaded --Muhammad (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It's now leaning backward, in case you still care to fix. - Blieusong (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Although it feels undersaturated, but maybe it's faithful to reality. - Blieusong (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support With the assumption that there will be some sort of agreement as to which way it is leaning, how much, and getting it fixed before a version is featured. Cat-five  t  c   05:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note to closer I will put up and edit for the leaning backwards that Benh mentioned later tonight --Muhammad (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Update? Makeemlighter (talk) 23:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I asked Muhammad. He said it'll be a little longer. I'll move this to Suspended for the moment. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it can safely be promoted. The leaning I mentioned is barely noticeable (and I was the only one to notice or mention it). - Blieusong (talk) 13:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed, your support vote wasn't on the condition that it was fixed anyway. It seemed more like a suggestion to me. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  14:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Per discussion with Muhammad and Diliff, any further changes, if they happen, will be very minor. It's time to promote. -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)