Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Baobab Adansonia digitata.jpg

Baobab
Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2013 at 19:02:12 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality and EV. Image has been stable in the article for almost 2 years now
 * Articles in which this image appears:Adansonia, Wildlife of Tanzania
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Good enough, also gives an idea what shadow can a baobab cast to rest there. Brandmeistertalk  14:23, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak support. I think our Plant FPs could do with more full plants as against the preponderance of flowers and fruits, and this is quite well composed and detailed, with reasonable lighting (perhaps a slight crop at right?). My main reason for 'weak' is that I feel that this is one of those cases where, while well within criteria, it could do with a bit more size to allow more detail of the tree to be seen. --jjron (talk) 13:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, though I agree with Jjron. Still, that's what Delist and Replace is for. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support : Good Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Whole plants in the wild are naturally difficult photograph in a way which will pass FPC. This is because most plants don't appear in isolation from other species, and it is difficult to get photos which aren't a confusing mess. JJ Harrison (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose The info box picture of Adansonia digitata has more EV in my opinion. J Kadavoor J e e 09:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 19:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)