Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Cannabis macro.JPG

Cannabis bud - Macro
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2011 at 03:11:16 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality, resolution and thus EV, depicts trichomes, red hairs, and other characteristics with scientific quality.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Cannabis (drug)
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Plants


 * Support as nominator --Garretttaggs55 (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose The picture has decent lighting. And the picture, overall, is… *decent*. However, the depth of field here is far too limited, IMHO, to merit being considered an example of fine, exemplary photography. Greg L (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can understand why this would be an issue, though keep in mind what is in focus is of good quality, and there's "enough" in focus I'd say to demonstrate the hairs, trichomes, and other structures present throughout the many amorphous specimens available. In other words, marijuana buds all look different and this shows a decent amount on one plane to be sufficiently demonstrative of the subject matter. Garretttaggs55 (talk) 02:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This is an example of where you would use focus stacking. — raeky  t  21:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per greg, but also as subject is cut off on LHS gaz hiley .co.uk  13:25, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per greg too. Staggering resolution, but DOF just too low, sorry. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per greg. — raeky  t  21:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose ill submit a better photo once I have the chance. Trimming it to have a consistent side profile should help with the DOF issue. Thanks. Garretttaggs55 (talk) 22:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * CombineZP is free focus stacking software. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Suggest Speedy Close per Garretttaggs55's suggestion that he will submit a new picture... gaz hiley .co.uk  15:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

-- Jujutacular  talk 07:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering the nominator's comment above a withdrawal. Feel free to open a new nomination when concerns have been addressed.  Jujutacular  talk 07:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)