Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocoite from the Dundas extended mine, Dundas, Tasmania, Australia.jpg

Crocoite

 * Reason:Something a bit different, the background isn't pure white so the highlights on some of the faces are easily distinguished from the background
 * Articles this image appears in:Crocoite
 * Creator:Noodle snacks


 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 13:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support good work on the hard subject.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support agree with the background choice. Support per nom.  Durova Charge! 16:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Much clearer than the one above.Terri G (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support: Very good and very interesting, with good detail and focus throughout. On a side (probably irrelevant) note, can the background be less "pink"?  Perhaps something more neutral would not clash so much with the orange subject?   Mae din \talk 20:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The background is grey? /me needs a new monitor . . .   Mae din \talk 08:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The background is grey? /me needs a new monitor . . .   Mae din \talk 08:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose Interesting formation but not convinced this is up to "studio" standards. I'm not 100% sold on the grey background but more significantly there is a lot of unpleasant texture in the (somewhat deep) shadow. If this can be fixed my vote changes to a weak support (not keen on the pale grey bg - it's a bit half hearted) --Fir0002 07:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure of the spatial frequency you are really concerned about, so I just gave the shadow a bit of a blur etc. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 02:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Sasata (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)