Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus.jpg

Danaid Eggfly

 * Reason:Good quality and EV. Similar colour with that of ground where it is usually found may also illustrate camouflage.
 * Articles this image appears in:Hypolimnas, Hypolimnas misippus
 * Creator:Muhammad


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Durova Charge! 04:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose Unfortunately this leaves me squinting. The wings are soft and the body is dark and doesn't contrast with the background. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's camouflaged, Noodle. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Support Yes, the wings don't stand out too well, but they're supposed to be camouflaged, so I can't complain there. Very nice picture. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The wings are soft, they stand out very well. It is the body that doesn't, and that is just a function of lighting imo. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Noodle snacks. It also doesn't illustrate its camouflage particularly well due to the shallow DOF.  I'm sure that different lighting or another background would produce a superior image and for easily replicated shots that is enough for me to oppose. --Leivick (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. I think the whole camouflage issue is trivial. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  ♣ kiss mei'm Irish ♣ 02:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

--Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)