Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone.jpg

Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2010 at 18:12:13 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality and EV. A fine representation of an endangered specie. More than 29 mega pixels. Featured on commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Gymnosperm, Encephalartos
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 18:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Not for size, but detail. -- I'ḏ ♥  One  19:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Size reference? (even in the caption or the image page?)  Spikebrennan (talk) 16:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * App 1.5 feet long --Muhammad (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Support-Impressive sharpness and detail.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. J Milburn (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is big and has lots of detail. But the composition is bland. Along with the messy background it has the feel of a "snapshot" (yes, crucify me for using the s-word ;-) ). Someone once used the analogy of a high-resolution image of a manhole cover which would never be an FP no matter what the quality was... --Dschwen 15:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Detailed, encyclopedic composition. No opinion on manhole FP :)  Jujutacular  talk 16:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Looks good to eat. Res Mar  22:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Good quality, but tight crop makes it hard to eyeball the size (without being told). That said, it's not enough to support.  Spencer T♦ C 23:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 00:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)