Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Eriophora sp 1.jpg

Eriophora

 * Reason:Another attempt at Eriophora heroine or Eriophora pustuosa (can't tell them apart from the photo)
 * Articles this image appears in:Eriophora
 * Creator:Noodle snacks


 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose The angle and lighting is nice - although maybe the top of the spider's abdomen could use a little curve adjustment/burning to recover a little detail (although my new machine hasn't arrivedca and my wife's iMac hasn't been calibrated recently so it may be this end in which case forget that). The thing the bugs me into the weak oppose is background noise and what I suspect is some graininess from focus stacking? I think some NR work could fix all that easy enough and then I'd move to support. Mfield (Oi!) 02:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * NRed. Noodle snacks (talk)
 * Support Nice. (p.s. I italicized the names) Sasata (talk) 19:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * QuestionHow big was it? --Muhammad (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * About the same size as the last one. ~2.5:1 Noodle snacks (talk) 04:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Not perfect but good enough --Muhammad (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose Indeed, a scale would be good. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I get opposition when I place scales in images because of the scale. Done nonetheless Noodle snacks (talk)
 * Not bad, but only an incremental improvement to illustrating the article (a good picture by Benjamint44 was kicked out of the article). Ironically there already was an FP by Fir0002 in the article, which seems to have been misidentified. So much for the cherished EV... --Dschwen 14:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

No quorum -- upstate NYer  05:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)