Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuyu Persimmon (Diospyros Kaki).jpg

Persimmon fruit
Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2012 at 11:28:25 (UTC)
 * Reason:Great food photography to the same standards are many existing fruit FPs. FP on Commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Persimmon
 * FP category for this image:Plants/Fruits
 * Creator:Joe Ravi

'''Any preferences? Does anyone care to fix the white balance?''' Makeemlighter (talk) 00:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Tomer T (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per nom Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice encyclopedically; would prefer there was no reflection on the left-hand image, but it's not a big deal. - Running On Brains (talk) 21:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 2, Oppose Edit 1. The whiter background is a nice improvement, but Edit 1 gives it a poor, green-screened effect.- Running On Brains (talk) 21:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support extra 999  ( talk ) 09:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per Runningonbrains --Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. Slightly washed out, but otherwise excellent EV. Nautica Shad es  21:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per above Jkadavoor (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Needs a size reference.  A scale would be ideal; a statement on the image page would be sufficient.  Spikebrennan (talk) 21:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak support. The white background could be whiter, but overall great quality photo. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅:--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support original, not crazy about super-white version. I wouldn't object to the background being brightened, but I don't see the benefit of the floating-in-space composition. Chick Bowen 15:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment White balance is off on the original (too magenta). JJ Harrison (talk) 22:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I do have the RAW file for this and can try and fix this later today. -- Jovian Eye storm 17:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Would be better for you to do it from RAW, of course. I was about to make the change this afternoon, but the file is currently protected because it's due to appear on the Commons main page on Thursday.  I've asked for it to be temporarily unprotected until the change is made.  Julia\talk  17:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems stupid to make such a small white balance fix and have to upload it as a separate file, but it looks like that's how this is going. Julia\talk  21:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Please review these files. I am leaning towards the version with WB corrected in photoshop. I am not keen on uploading a new file with correction and would prefer overwriting the current version on commons. But, sometimes rules can be very irritating, especially when one trying to do something constructive. If admins on commons refuse to unprotect the file, then I would suggest that we wait till it automatically loses protection (as long as this wait is tolerable to the admins over here). -- Jovian Eye storm 02:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW, Shot 2 looks the best. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ New version is up. -- Jovian Eye storm 03:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That was quick! Makeemlighter (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Suspend until this gets worked out. Makeemlighter (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Does the updated original work for everyone? Makeemlighter (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll accept it. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Edit 2 Sorry for the late edit. If anyone wants to consider it, feel free --Muhammad (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll accept it (updated original work). Jkadavoor (talk) 06:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with the updated original; oppose edit 2. Chick Bowen 02:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)