Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Heart diagram-en.svg 2

Heart diagram
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2012 at 07:15:44 (UTC)
 * Reason:This was previously nominated by User:Makeemlighter here and was closed with no quorum. The diagram has evolved a bit and thought might give it another try. Issues raised by Jjron have been fixed if not improved.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Human heart, Heart, Ventricle (heart), Chordae tendineae
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
 * Creator:ZooFari

Suspend until reference fixed. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator  Zoo Fari  07:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. OK diagram and I like the cross-section approach.  However, in the two general hear articles, there are a lot of similar diagrams and such (one has this image dropped down into references and is just way overloaded with same stuff).  For the more particular  articles on heart string and ventricle, the diagram is somewhat helpful as they lack a diagram.  But I think for those articles, this drawing is overkill, labeling every part of the heart, rather than the few relevant to that smaller topic.TCO (Reviews needed) 06:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You say "in the two general hear articles, there are a lot of similar diagrams and such", but there aren't any other cross-sectional diagrams of hearts in either article. There are external labeling diagrams, but you don't get a perspective on the actual shape of the chambers.  Spencer T♦ C 06:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per previous nomination; I supported that as well.  Spencer T♦ C 06:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, AGF it is accurate to the sources.  upstate NYer  05:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support It is a beautiful diagram --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  19:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, although the highlight on the left common carotid artery should be curved to match the shape of the artery. Kaldari (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment One of the references (second) is a broken link which should be fixed. It is worth putting a webcite (http://www.webcitation.org/) link in a comment next to references if something is liable to disappear (eg web links). JJ Harrison (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Updated sources and fixed gradient errors. ZooFari (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * When I click through past the image page the backing of the left atrium disappears (visible on image page). Can someone check this? --jjron (talk) 15:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed. I have also changed the gradient above the semilunar valve leading up into the pulmonary arteries to make it more "hole-like". You may compare between the versions and re-evaluate (if procedures here allow it). ZooFari (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Back to voting for a few more days. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - updated refs are fine. Needs moving back to voting area... Nik the  stoned  16:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops! Makeemlighter (talk) 01:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if you just want more support votes, you have another here. Quite nice. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Though I think we have too many FP diagrams that aren't anything very special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pteronura brasiliensis (talk • contribs) 16:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support (Awesome work) and congrats :-) -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)