Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Hypericum calycinum Tasmania.jpg

Hypericum calycinum

 * Reason:Well lit and clear depiction of the numerous stamens
 * Articles this image appears in:Hypericum calycinum, Hypericum
 * Creator:Noodle snacks

--Noodle snacks (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - For enc reasons, I don't agree with the replacement of the prevoius lead image in Hypericum calycinum, which is an illustration showing the whole plant. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone changed it anyway, but the previous image is not a realistic photograph. For me it'd still be ambiguous to about half a dozen Hypericum images and the differentiating factor for most species is the flower. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Conditional support as long as Alvesgaspar's concern is taken into account, this is a lovely shot. Surely there's enough room for both images.  Durova Charge! 20:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support well done. —  Aitias  // discussion 23:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Quality image; beautiful flower. ~  ωαdεstεr 16 «talkstalk» 17:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Conditional support per Alvesgaspar and Durova, otherwise oppose. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it was fixed days ago. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it has to stick as well, dunnit? Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 11:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, well I am not planning on changing it. Noodle snacks (talk) 12:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Generally well lit but I'm not keen on the overally dark background... --Fir0002 11:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support I really like it; the stamens are shown in great detail and even the stigma is visible. eug (talk) 07:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)