Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Isophysis tasmanica.jpg

Isophysis tasmanica

 * Reason:Good Image in a native environment. The upper part of the background is Lake Pedder.
 * Articles this image appears in:Isophysis tasmanica
 * Creator:Noodle snacks


 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 11:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support; focus isn't perfect, but I do like the "natural but not distrating" background. J Milburn (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Question. Is this a definite ID? From the article: "It has...star-like yellow to brownish-red flowers". Doesn't seem to gel, or perhaps article is lacking some info? --jjron (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * According to this there is a rare yellow form. The Tasmanian Waratah or the Common Teatree are other examples that come in different colours. On the ID issue I am confident, google has plenty of matching examples. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 *  Conditional Support per nom, pending ID confirmation (see above). --jjron (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm confident on this ID based on charcteristics shown in the photo that correlate with this reference:
 * Local in the mountains of Western Tasmania (Mt Eliza, Southwest National Park, Tasmania)
 * Superior ovary
 * Syle with thick recurved stigmatic branches
 * Half-nodding flower
 * Single terminal flower enclosed in paired, opposed, large leafy spathes. Melburnian (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If I'm reading that right it suggests flower colour is "dark red-purple or yellow", so perhaps the article could be touched up with this info. --jjron (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Support: Very nice.   Mae din \talk 21:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Nice image, good EV, far superior to other images of this subject on the internet. Melburnian (talk) 22:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Per nom. As usual, good quality shot. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  21:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Durova  391 20:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 00:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)