Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:LOC Main Reading Room Highsmith.jpg

Library of Congress Main Reading Room
Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2011 at 19:00:36 (UTC)
 * Reason:This is a beautiful, high-rez photo of the interior of the Main Reading Room at the Library of Congress, taken off hours, under what is almost perfect lighting. Not only a great photo, but a photo of a location where no photos are allowed (this is the best we had until I upload the nominated image). Frankly, I think this image speaks for itself.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Library of Congress, Thomas Jefferson Building
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
 * Creator:Carol M. Highsmith (from the Carol M. Highsmith Collection at the Library of Congress)


 * Support as nominator -- upstate NYer  19:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. I've been there.TCO (reviews needed)  19:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's a valid argument ;) --Elekhh (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice.  ■ MMXX  talk  21:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support quality not perfect, but overall a nice wide-angle photo --kaʁstn 22:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral I think libraries are best represented by their reading rooms, and this image gives a nice overview. So I moved it to the infobox where I think it does a better job than at the bottom of the page. It would be much better if there were at least few people in the image as well. I am a bit put off by the so-so quality at full size: lack of sharpness and chromatic aberrations all over the image. Also the full perspective correction did result in strong distortions at the edges. For comparison this I find better. --Elekhh (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Noted. I will point out, though, that the field of view of your example is markedly less than the image given, but still shows notable distortion due to correction. I think holding against the photo the lack of people is not fair because getting this room empty, as it appears sans humans, is a notable occurrence; appreciate the pure beauty of the bare architecture. Lack of sharpness and chromatic aberrations would be fixed if I reduced image size to have a 1000 px side size. You'd see no evidence of it. However, the image is 6,100 x 4,100 px; appreciate this because you'll most likely never see a similar quality image free to use for all for the rest of eternity. Your standards seem a tad high. :)  upstate NYer  04:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please don't say I will never see a better image :) but you persuaded me with your last sentence. Change to weak support. --Elekhh (talk) 08:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support this is beautiful (definitely has wow! factor), makes the reader want to know more, and has enc. value. It does get a little fuzzy when you zoom in a lot, but it's not noticeable at any reasonable size. Puchiko (Talk-email) 18:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak support agree with Puchiko and Carschten.  Pine (was GreenPine)  talk 02:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support, time we got a cross-pond counterpart to this (Although I would like it even more if they had somehow gotten the same angle used in All the President's Men). Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Big wow for me. Too bad the right arcades aren't lit like the left ones, and author could have fixed the CA as well. - Blieusong (talk) 19:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Very good. Meets the 8 requirements. It’s excellent to see the statues of Beethoven and Herodotus next to each other! TehGrauniad (talk) 23:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Awe-inspiring and beautifully taken.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 00:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Absolutely fantastic. But is it just me or are the horizontals tilted a little to the right? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 09:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)