Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Moshi panorama.jpg

Moshi panorama

 * Reason:Good quality, colours and EV. The only image in the Moshi article which shows the townscape. Background Mt Kilimanjaro also adds a sense of location. FWIW, even the inhabitants of Moshi had not seen such a view prior to this.
 * Articles this image appears in:Moshi, Mount Kilimanjaro
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support lovely panorama with high EV. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 23:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Support Edit 1. The foreground seems a bit overexposed and there is a fairly clear line where (I assume) you've darkened the background. I can sympathise as it looks like the background/sky could have been hazy/overexposed without it, but I think it would benefit from having a more subtle transition and darker foreground. Nice view with good EV though. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've got an edit ready and have spent the last four hours uploading it but it's not yet done. --Muhammad (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Edit Uploaded --Muhammad (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good improvement, looks much better now. How awful that it takes 4+ hours to upload 1.6mb though. ;-) Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 17:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It took much longer and ultimately failed. I had to restart the upload some time later :( --Muhammad (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Not terribly keen with the projection used on the buildings - too much of a curve/lean developing at the edges. I've uploaded a rough edit to show how I'd have liked the projection to look - but you'd really need to apply the warping to the original to maintain quality... --Fir0002 08:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Outstanding resolution and angle of choice (support for the second variation (edit1), the others no). - Damërung  ...ÏìíÏ..._ Ξ_         .   --  14:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support edit 1. It's a great image, I just wish a little more of foreground was included.--ragesoss (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support edit 1. It's a great image, I just wish a little more of foreground was included.--ragesoss (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

-- wadester 16  05:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)