Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthetrum chrysostigma.jpg

Orthetrum chrysostigma

 * Reason:Good quality, DOF, and EV.
 * Articles this image appears in:Orthetrum, Orthetrum chrysostigma
 * Creator:Muhammad


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Week support - Good quality and composition but I would prefer another position of the wings -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I would have liked the same but it did not place its wings in another position apart from this one. Even after it flew away from one spot to another, it still had the exact same wing position --Muhammad (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Slight issue with contrast regarding the wing position, but interesting to see how this insect's wings bend.  Durova Charge! 00:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral There are lots of dragonfly FPs. Raising the camera position a bit would have cleared the eyes of the wings. You have dust spots too. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support The wings really don't obscure the subject too much, I mean they're, what, 98% transparent? At least this way, the wings come out quite sharp. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 17:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Nice picture. — A itias  //  discussion  20:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

--wadester16 | Talk→ 18:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)