Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pachira aquatica (fruit).jpg

Pachira aquatica
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2012 at 21:24:52 (UTC)


 * Reason:A very nice image, valuable to the article Pachira aquatica
 * Articles in which this image appears:Pachira aquatica
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits
 * Creator:Lycaon


 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Good quality and EV.  ■ MMXX  talk  23:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 - the edit looks right to me. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. --jjron (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC) Pref to Edit 1. --jjron (talk) 10:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support. I was going to suggest a more balanced crop (given the nut is slightly to the left of centre) but given the foliage I'd say it's about right as is.  Nik the  stoned  17:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC) — Prefer Edit 1.  Nik  the  stoned  12:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support high EV --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  22:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Isn't it a bit too warm? --Muhammad (talk) 02:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the same... ZooFari (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree now that I'm back at home with a proper monitor. JJ Harrison (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Size reference--even a measurement stated in the image page--would be helpful.  Spikebrennan (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * oppose per Muhammad. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 08:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please don't oppose because of my reason. Fixing the color is a very simple thing to do --Muhammad (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I made a corresponding minimal edit a few days ago, and it got reverted on Commons with the reasoning that edits of existing QIs/VIs are nuh-uh, but Lycaon previously communicated that he wants edits to be uploaded over the top, so I've asked the reverter what he wants to happen. If anyone wants to express an opinion, feel free to do so on his Commons talk page. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 10:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm very prepared to change to a support when the colour is fixed, but until then I stick by my oppose. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support alt 1 only, looks good. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Is that exclusively for ALT1? Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Clearly he means Edit 1 only. --jjron (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He clarified after my comment. I had asked to ensure an accurate count by the closer. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I futilely didn't want to clog up the nom with too much off topic blah. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, perhaps we should just remove this OT blah. :) --jjron (talk) 12:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support The warmness matches the climate on that location.-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 09:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Edit 1 Uploaded --Muhammad (talk) 05:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 --Muhammad (talk) 05:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose edit 1 - I think you've taken it a bit too far, appears rather bleached now. Try somewhere in the middle. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 12:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with PLW, I prefer the original.  ■ MMXX  talk  22:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * +1 --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  16:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * +2 Pteronura brasiliensis 16:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose original, Support Edit 1 The color correction has given it enough EV to convince me. Clegs (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1. The cooler colours are more natural. I don't think it would strike anyone as bleached unless viewed next to the original, which may be more pleasing but is arguably of lower EV.
 * Must remember to sign comments!  God Emperor Talk  20:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)