Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama La Défense.jpg

Panorama La Défense
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2011 at 02:55:08 (UTC)


 * Reason:High quality panorama
 * Articles in which this image appears:Paris, La Défense
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:Dimitri Destugues


 * Support as nominator --Hoang Quan 02:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Its not perfect (a few crooked buildings, noise in the sky, feels cut off at the bottom), but I've often thought that a good panorama of the paris CBD was a glaring omission in our FPs. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * As for someone who lives there, and who has taken a few Paris shots, it's because it's not easy to get the opportunity... Most of the buildings are offices, and they won't let you reach the higher floors easily (already asked). I wonder who author asked, but it seems taken from Défense 2000 which is apartments building. Maybe he has a friend or relative there. - Blieusong (talk) 21:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose due to blown highlights. Maybe this could be fixed with editing. Pinetalk 09:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Agree with JJ, shame about the highlights but the amount of detail there is superb and outweighs that imo. Fallschirmjäger &#9993; 08:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Few technical flaws, but maybe it's not so easy to do better, and it's OK given the size. And one has to be able to take a picture from such place... I wonder about FOP issues though.- Blieusong (talk) 21:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support: The FOP issues would probably fall under "unavoidable presence", which makes them okay. Colours are good, difficult shot because of the permissions issue, highlights are a little blown but I agree that they are offset by the difficulty of the shot. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support – Nice panorama, good lighting, highlights are blown by a bit but they don't detract too much. — mc10 ( t / c ) 18:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 00:27, 1 September 2011 (UTC)