Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pink lady and cross section.jpg

Pink Lady and cross section

 * Reason:High quality technically and excellent EV. I'm interested in what people think about adding the extra view of the top of the apple to the composition?
 * Articles this image appears in:Cripps Pink
 * Creator:Fir0002


 * Support as nominator --Fir0002 10:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Well done, as usual. Please see my comments on the nature of all of these studio shots in the Red Delicious nom.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 18:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Durova Charge! 01:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support --Avala (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Spikebrennan (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Support I think the extra view at the top is fine. Good job.  Spencer T♦C 02:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Question how does the average person know just from the picture that this is a Pink Lady, and not some other pink-red-green apple such as a Braeburn? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * How does the average person know how to distinguish between a Pink Lady and a Braeburn in the first place? If there's an obvious distinguishing feature, then of course that should be illustrated in the photo, but otherwise, I think photos should be seen as complements to the text, not to be taken wholly on their own. After all, it's hard to tell who the subject of a portrait is if you don't already know how the subject looks, but in context of an article, they serves as good illustrations on how the person looks. Thegreenj 15:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 07:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)