Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague Panorama - Oct 2010.jpg

File:Prague Panorama - Oct 2010.jpg
Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2010 at 14:14:28 (UTC)
 * Reason:Figured I'd pop my head in for a nomination. :-) I took this recently on a trip to Prague and I think it does a good job of illustrating the geography section of Prague. It's very high resolution and a fairly complete view taking in a 180 degree view from Petřín Lookout Tower.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Prague
 * FP category for this image:Featured_pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:User:Diliff


 * Support as nominator -- &#208;iliff   &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  14:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Prague-tically perfect... hehe gaz hiley .co.uk  15:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I missed your puns. ;-) Yeah, it's a shame a shadow is cast over the right side. If I had got up there 15 minutes earlier it would have been completely bathed in sunlight. And 5-10 minutes after this panorama, it was completely clouded over. You win some, you lose some. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  15:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been on hols for a couple of weeks visiting the rents in the Lakes - My mum certainly doesn't share your view on my puns! hehe... I will admit the shadow aspect of this isn't an issue for me - I didn't notice it until you and Purpy Pupple mentionned it... gaz hiley .co.uk  09:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support A beautiful picture of a seemingly nice place. I was starting to wonder when you were going to upload again. --Muhammad (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Impeccable image quality and an invaluable amount of encyclopedic value. It is, of course, too bad that the city is partially in shadows; but the sheer excellence of the image quality far outweighs that minor issue. By the way, there seems to be a lot of people on the bridge. Is that normal? Just curious. Purpy Pupple (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, very normal. :-) &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  23:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Remember visiting this tower myself many years ago. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support; I've been to the tower too. Lovely view of the city. J Milburn (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support per nom -- Extra   999 
 * Oppose It's a great stock photo, but there is nothing spectacular about it. Shroomydan (talk) 01:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Amazing. I got stuck for several minutes just looking at all the details. P. S. Burton  (talk)  18:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support after seeing the thumb, and the shadow, I wanted to oppose; but I simply cannot not support this after seeing how impressive is the zoom. Nergaal (talk) 07:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * support* I repent of my earlier opposition. At full size the image is quite spectacular.Shroomydan (talk) 01:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support That's a big picture!!! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 02:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Undeniably high in EV, and has exquisite detail.    Sophus Bie  (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Nice work! SMasters (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)