Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Rainbow lorikeet.jpg

Rainbow Lorikeet

 * Reason:High quality image of a beautiful bird
 * Articles this image appears in:Rainbow Lorikeet
 * Creator:Fir0002


 * Support as nominator --Fir0002 07:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Nice composition and detail. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 08:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Good composition and EV. IMO requires a NR though --Muhammad (talk) 08:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Adds a lot to the article, nice photo, good EV.  |→ Spaully τ 09:15, 2 July 2009 (GMT)
 * Weak support Head detail and great colour carry it; I don't think more DOF would have made a big improvement. I find the composition a little affected, though; one of those where a centered crop would be more impressive. --mikaultalk 12:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Durova  273 featured contributions 14:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support An excellent shot and beautiful subject.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 14:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per above, what a great colours. - Damërung  ...ÏìíÏ..._ Ξ_         .   --  15:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Very beautiful picture, with vivid colors. --Carioca (talk) 18:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent composition, great colors! -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Good quality and EV. Makeemlighter (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral I'm such a party pooper, but the colours look oversaturated to me. Was this taken with flash? (Hmm, looking closely, I think it was - there's a slight shadow from the branch on its belly.) Stevage 02:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes it used a small amount of fill flash. But the colours are quite natural - it's an incredibly colourful bird. cf flickr --Fir0002 10:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, I've seen plenty :) That's why I was curious. Stevage 08:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

--Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)