Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarcophaga africa.jpg

Sarcophaga africa scavenger

 * Reason:Good quality, lighting and EV. Illustrates the scavenger article quite well. Also, long time since a fly was nominated here. Already an FP at commons.
 * Articles this image appears in:Sarcophaga africa, Forensic entomology, Scavenger, Flesh-fly
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support There is a similar image in Flesh-fly but they are found in exclusive articles otherwise. The meat in the picture provides separate enc to the faeces. I should hope that it isn't human flesh. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support; not your best, but certainly decent. EV would be improved if it appeared in an article about the species. J Milburn (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Now appears in the newly created article Sarcophaga africa thanks to User:IP69.226.103.13. --Muhammad (talk) 12:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose To many fucking flies already, I have counted at least 4 pictures of flies as featured pictures in the last 8 months. Please find yourself another fetish.
 * Comment was added by 201.166.32.84 (talk) on 14:04, 23 December 2009. Might relate to this. Elekhh (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC) '''


 * Support 201.166 has it wrong. I think only these fucking flies: Housefly mating.jpg have been promoted to FP recently (no idea, but irresistible to respond thus). This FPC is about a flesh-eating fly, others have been about shit-eating flies, not fucking flies. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Please find some other place to act like idiots. -- mcshadypl T C  06:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

--jjron (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support nice depth of view for such a macro -- Chris 73 | Talk 06:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Good technical quality, nice composition. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 14:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)