Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Sybilla pretiosa Cryptic mantis Luc Viatour.jpg

Sybilla pretiosa

 * Reason:resolution quality
 * Articles this image appears in:Sibylla_pretiosa, Mantidae
 * Creator:Luc Viatour (talk)


 * Support as nominator --Luc Viatour (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Arrr, This be pleasin' to me eye. But i get the impression that the WB might have a green tinge to it. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent composition!  Zoo Fari  15:46, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support —  Jake   Wartenberg  16:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. Poor lighting angle. Kaldari (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose original per Kaldari, Noodle snacks. Unfortunately, the auto white balance blows out the blue channel on the wing, and red channel on the branch. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 17:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Support, especially if someone does a partial white balance. The color balance problem is relatively minor; the composition and overall quality make up for it, and partial white balancing could be done without blowing any channels.--ragesoss (talk) 23:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Which version? MER-C 02:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The original, unless someone does a subtler edit for color balance.
 * Support original:  Mae din \talk 12:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the original is the preference. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 06:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)