Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Tachysphex specie.jpg

Tachysphex sp

 * Reason:Good quality, EV and DOF.
 * Articles this image appears in:Crabronidae, Tachysphex
 * Creator:Muhammad


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support prefer original Assuming a better ID isn't possible. The edit feels cramped to me.Noodle snacks (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It isn't. MER-C 08:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Please comment on the edit. MER-C 09:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose I find the blurred foreground very distracting, which I know would be difficult to avoid at this scale, hence the weakness of the oppose. Also is the bit at the front a proboscis or one antenna obscuring the other? Terri G (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The blurry foreground as you rightfully mention is impossible to avoid at this level of magnification without compromising on the quality of the picture. At the front, one antenna is obscuring the other, but in my experience photographing wasps, it is quite commons for such an occurrence. --Muhammad (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe it'd be possible to crop a bit of the foreground? Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 06:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Edit1 Uploaded. --Muhammad (talk) 08:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Still weak oppose due to blurred feet, sorry. Terri G (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Edit1:  Mae din \talk 09:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 Removing the blur really helps this image. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 16:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 per nom and Wadester.  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 00:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 Amazing detail on this. mennonot (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support with strong preference to Edit 1. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 08:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)