Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarn Shelf Mt Field National Park 2.jpg

Tarn Shelf

 * Reason:Illustrative of Tarn, you can see the path of the glacier. If you walk off into the distance the tarns and lakes continue for many kilometres. I'm not so happy with some of the pictures from the later tarns further on. I'm going to have to climb the Rodway Range on the left for that I think.
 * Articles this image appears in:Mount Field National Park, Tarn (lake)
 * Creator:Noodle snacks

--jjron (talk) 12:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 04:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. Not the most compelling view to be honest. It looks rather more like a couple of rocky puddles at first glance! The sense of scale also isn't very apparent until you see a couple of lone trees toward the background. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  14:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. Lack of sense of scale. Odd pole in the front. As of Mount Field National Park, the article already has 4 FPs of higher quality. Elekhh (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is 3, which is admittedly a few, but this represents quite a different environment to the waterfalls in my view. A fairly precise (but indirect) scale is available from the geocoding. Noodle snacks (talk) 08:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support for the encyclopedic value. Wishing it were possible to get a better capture.  Durova  379 22:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose per Diliff and Elekhh because of the lack of sense of scale. Difficult to tell those are lakes in the thumbnail version.  Jujutacular  T · C 23:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)