Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Tregellasia capito - Julatten.jpg

Pale-yellow Robin
Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2011 at 00:07:16 (UTC)
 * Reason:It is a pleasing image of this small species.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Pale-yellow Robin
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
 * Creator:JJ Harrison


 * Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Good pic and the article is not a stub. I do think you should do a tighter crop since in article you are putting it in the infobox which makes display smaller than when used as a lead photo without an info box.TCO (reviews needed)  00:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. I am not greatly concerned by the crop, but would not object to alternatives being offered. J Milburn (talk) 10:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose I had to re-think this one. The image has nice composition and good EV, but it has a lot of blur in various parts. I think we can do better.  Pine (was GreenPine)  talk 18:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Great quality, good EV. Pine: depth of field issues are a fact of life, and this image handles it just fine.  Jujutacular  talk 19:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * IMO this photo fails the FP requirement of being among Wikipedia's best work, because of the DOF.  Pine (was GreenPine)  talk 02:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah - we got that from your vote :). JJ Harrison (talk) 06:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral agree with the shallow DOF, but with looking at the meta data it seems not easy to reach a better DOF, so a neutral vote. --kaʁstn 22:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak support there's something I can't quite put my finger on that doesn't feel right with the wing and the bit of the bark that's in focus. Maybe if the resolution were higher this wouldn't be the case, or maybe it's to do with sharpness. Also the tail and left foot are out of focus. The cut-off point between what's in focus and what's out-of-focus is severe, which makes the shot look a little odd on very close inspection (I guess this is what others are referring to as depth of field). However, it's a fabulous photo, it enhances its page hugely, and is well worthy of being a FP. TehGrauniad (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral persuaded by comments by TehGrauniad not to oppose.  Pine (was GreenPine)  talk 09:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Good quality--Alborzagros (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Support  -- good picture, all of the key details in focus enough for me. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2011 (UTC)