Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Zinnia x hybrida.jpg

Zinnia x hybrida

 * Reason:Good quality and EV. Well focus flower and non distracting leaves add EV. Good lighting as well.
 * Articles this image appears in:Zinnia
 * Creator:Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator --Muhammad (talk) 00:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose Not a fan of the lighting.  upstate NYer formerly wadester16 01:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Alt 1Uploaded --Muhammad (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Snapshotty lighting, and for a flower shot (static subject, intrinsically pretty) the picture should have more artistic merit than this (goes for the alt too). --Dschwen 19:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose both Lack of a cultivar name or location information reduces EV. --Melburnian (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Question I would welcome an explanation of what are the flaws of the lighting in this picture. What is wrong and in what way it could be better? For me this is one of those moments in which I really don't see what is going on and I feel I would learn a lot new things if someone explains me a little. Thanks.  Franklin.vp   15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)