Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Fog over Oaş Country, Romania

Fog over Oaş Country

 * Reason:It is a beautiful image of the Romanian countryside covered in fog
 * Articles this image appears in:Fog, Oaş Country
 * Creator:Mario1987


 * Support as nominator Mario1987 (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support because i live in the Oaş Country and i know how it is Sathmar (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's a legitimate reason, FYI. de Bivort 16:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Local pride certainly isn't, but if he's saying that he knows the region and thinks the picture does a good job portraying it, that would be a good reason. --Dschwen 17:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I live in Negreşti Oaş the capital of the romanian historical region Oaş Country. Sathmar (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That does look beautiful, and it's all part of the European Union now :-). Two things though, the Horizon looks a bit tilted (or are the clouds fooling my eye?) and the details look pretty washed out at full size. --Dschwen 16:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose grain/blur in the foreground. de Bivort 16:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Very badly artifacted. Clegs (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per User:Clegs. Bewareofdog (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Very nice picture. Basketball 110  01:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support The picture is very nice, the author of this picture is the uploader and there is no reason why this picture cannot be uploaded Adrianzax (talk) 14:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhm.. this is not a deletion discussion, nobody claims it should not have been uploaded. We are discussing whether this image is one of the best among all pictures in WP. --Dschwen 14:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Excellent composition and beautiful photo. It's a shame that at full resolution you have chunky, distracting artifacts in the grass, the sky, the trees, just everywhere.--Bridgecross (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - beautiful composition and atmosphere, but technical quality is not high enough.--Svetovid (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Technical issues detract from the beauty of the shot. -- Shark face  217  02:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)