Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/George Juskalian1

George Juskalian
Voting period ends on 25 May 2013 at 21:45:31 (UTC)
 * Reason:The quality is great. It is directly from the archives of the Juskalian family. I believe it is a great fit for a man that is not very known but has achieved so much. For the record, the article along with its picture also appeared on DYK on 6 May 2013 and the picture has been enlarged and the quality is still retained.
 * Articles in which this image appears:George Juskalian
 * FP category for this image:Featured_pictures/People/Military
 * Creator:proudbolsahye


 * Support as nominator --Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Question I disagree that an enlarged image retains "quality"; I'm assuming by enlarged you mean the original 900x1300 image was resized to 1500x2167? (Also note that the enlarged image has a smaller file size than the original.) Are you able to request a larger, original scan of the image? I will only support if a larger, non-enlarged version can be obtained. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 22:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Well I can always ask the family to rescan. However, I still believe the quality of this photograph is this FP worthy. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * My biggest concern is the grain. If you can get a rescan, I don't see why this image wouldn't be FP worthy. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 22:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * "Grain" is not an issue of the enlargement. It would be there regardless due to the scan. Proudbolsahye (talk) 22:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Well I may be in the minority, but I'm still curious if the family would allow a larger scan. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 02:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Grain doesn't seem like an issue for me. The quality is still good.--Chauahuasachca (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Support The image looks good to me, the quality is acceptable too.-- Ե րևանցի talk  22:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Quite a good photo placed in an interesting article. Grain doesn't seem much of a issue. The quality is great and appealing.--Chauahuasachca (talk) 22:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support as before. --Pine✉ 00:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support.  Jackal  13:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support. Lets pass this one already, its getting old :p -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  22:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 22:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)