Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gillette Mach3

Gillette Mach3
Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2015  at 00:24:41 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality shot. Pin sharp and very detailed.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Gillette Mach3, razor
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
 * Creator: — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support I'm sure this is the best photo possible; at least the best a man can get. Belle (talk) 01:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you saying you want to take a better picture? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - I can verify that that is a razor. GamerPro64  02:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak support Beetlejuicex3 (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your interest in FPC. However, as stated in the opening explanation, "only [votes from users] who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count." You are free to comment as you please, however. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose – Sorry, but I'm always underwhelmed by photos of currently available commercial products. Sca (talk) 14:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - Rainbow unicorn (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It isn't a particularly good composition of a dull commercial product. Much better is possible. FunkyCanute (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Such as? Keeping in mind, of course, that the subject is the razor itself and not the act of shaving. (Although an image of a person shaving with a Mach3 would be useful, it would have little value in illustrating the razor as a razor; between the shaving foam obscuring the cartridge and the hands around the handle, little of the razor would be visible) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How 'bout a selfie of you shaving with it? Or, alternatively, of you happily paying for the cartridges? Sca (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Even at Indonesian prices, there is no "happily paying for the cartridges". — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You'd think somebody over there would make cheap counterfeits – or does Gillette's long legal arm reach that far? Sca (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Why don't you just wax, boys? Or veet (don't try this; apparently it causes burns because your delicate manly faces aren't as tough as our legs) Belle (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There's always radiation. Sca (talk) 21:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've Nair-ed before. Works for the eyebrows, not the cheeks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Due to the picture being taken from the blade end, it is not possible to see that the blade (cartridge) can be detached: the mechanism is obscured by the blade. The lighting is also rather harsh and in places the image is slightly burnt out. FunkyCanute (talk) 17:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Support –Jobas (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support -- In a couple of hundred years it will be very interesting. Hafspajen (talk) 13:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Sca and FunkyCanute. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 11:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support -- Sharpppp.... DreamSparrow  Chat   16:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Mydreamsparrow: The lens is a very good one. I actually prefer it to all of my other lenses, but sadly 100mm can be hard to use in enclosed spaces. Maybe if I had another L lens of a shorter I'd change my tune, but even the nifty fifty falls behind. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support Some good effort was made. --PetarM (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support – Yann (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Support --Hubertl (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 02:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)