Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Goalkeeper

Goalkeeper

 * Reason:Composition, facial expression, good motion blur.
 * Articles this image appears in:Association football, Goalkeeper, Association football positions
 * Creator:Master Sgt. Lance Cheung


 * Support as nominator -- I. Pankonin (t&middot;c) 10:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - Its okay, a little dull, i would not say this is one of the best images Wikipedia has to offer. &larr; &kappa;&epsilon;&eta;&eta;&epsilon;&part;&gamma; (talk) (contribs) 11:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above, and because nothing is really in focus. Juliancolton The storm still blows...  14:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. No chance that he's not hanging from wires. D\=&lt; (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above.  Sing  Cal  01:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Increasing the saturation may help. Sifaka   talk  06:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support from picture peer review, I liked the dynamic action and composition. A striking image. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 23:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak support. As with Jeff, I liked this at PPR, but commented there that it would probably need a bit of 'work' done on it before being nominated here. As it hasn't had any improvements made I can only weak support. --jjron (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 'Oppose too much motion blur, not enough context (how big is this goal that he is guarding?). I'd support on Commons, but my opinion is that is suffers from a lac of enc.  Cacophony (talk) 02:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Interesting reason - aren't all soccer goals a standard size (except for ones intentionally made smaller, such as for children's games)? --jjron (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support interesting, dynamic shot. Muhammad (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose too grainy for my liking, sorry --Hadseys Chat Contribs 16:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Hadseys--CPacker (talk) 04:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Would it be possible to downsample this a little? I looks good grain-wise at about 2/3 rez, and the dynamic composition might--might--excuse some focusing issues.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 02:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 09:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)