Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grass flower head

Grass flower head


Meadow Foxtail grass Alopecurus pratensis

Took this photo near a river I was going to go swimming in.

Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 10:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) +4 / -4 -- Solipsist 16:13, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) 
 * Support Circeus 13:16, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * I couldn't resist trying to clean up such a nice pic. It'd probably be best if you uploaded a much less compressed version from your camera; this one looks really artifacty.  I'll support either version, though. -- BRIAN 0918   15:25, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks Brian for your edit. I've uploaded the original, but the jpeg quality on that isn't too impressive as my camera isn't all that great. If you want to waste any more time on this pic here is the original [[Media:Meadow Foxtail.JPG|Original Meadow Foxtail grass head]]
 * Oppose I do not find this any of beautiful, striking, shocking, impressive, titillating, fascinating, or in short just brilliant. Since these are the criteria... Denni &#9775; 18:40, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)
 * Support. I like the detail in the grass stem. Very instructive. Enochlau 01:09, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you to User:MPF for identifying my misnamed canary grass as 'Meadow Foxtail'--Fir0002 04:00, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Nothing special. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  14:33, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose Just not striking - Adrian Pingstone
 * Support original version. Looks dull as dishwater until you look at the high-res version. Lupin 22:49, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support either version. Junes 08:53, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose - nothing special Brookie 10:04, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)