Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hibiscus Closeup

Hibiscus Closeup


Close up of the hibiscus, i think this can be a good example for macro photography. please provide your feedback.

Pegasus1138 Talk 02:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 
 * Self Nominate and support. - vineeth 08:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, very good. Support. - Samsara contrib talk 11:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I think we already have plenty of better Featured pictures for macrophotography, and this doesn't depict the Hibiscus very well. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-02-15 13:15
 * There are exactly two in the article, neither of which is a nature photograph. - Samsara contrib talk 15:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)*
 * Macro photography isn't the only place to find macro photographs that are Featured and are of nature. But, as you said, there are already 2 Featured Pictures in that article alone. &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-02-16 00:02
 * Oppose This could be almost any flower so doesn't add anything to the article. As a picture I like it a lot, I just don't see it as a Featured Pic - Adrian Pingstone 15:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. It is a nice picture. However, it is not a good illustration for an encyclopedia. Mikeo 18:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with Adrian and Mikeo. And I prefer the other nature pic in the macro photography article ;-P --Dschwen 07:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose ACK Mikeo Calderwood 07:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. Good pic, but not FA quality. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 21:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)