Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hurricane Isabel eye

The eye of Hurricane Isabel

 * Reason:This is a rather detailed and clear image of the eye of Hurricane Isabel during the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season. A NASA astronaut, Ed Lu, took this image of the eye of Hurricane Isabel from the International Space Station at 11:18 UTC on September 13, 2003.
 * Articles this image appears in:Hurricane Isabel
 * Creator:Ed Lu

I'm afraid it's the turn of the pedantic knowitall to pop up-in the caption,it should be 'its peak' not 'it's peak' Lemon martini (talk) 11:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support but prefer Edit 1 - Did some exposure adjustment which i think was needed. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but does the edit make the center of the eye look a tad too dark? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, the edit does look better. Thanks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Only for the EV. The quality isn't great but its good enough for FP. &mdash; §unday   b  01:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 The EV value is very good and edit 1 definitely goes far to fix it being a bit too light although I had the same thought as Julian before I went and tweaked my monitor settings a little bit. Cat-five - talk 01:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Original version is a better starting point for edits (larger, dust specks can be removed, no JPG re-compression issues). Juliancolton, when uploading new versions of images with significant differences do not upload over the original!--Nilfanion (talk) 01:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I could tell they were very minor tweaks more than significant differences... –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * A crop is a significant change, particularly in the context of FPC. In context, I feel the original works better as a thumbnail in article (the extra vertical size helps). When in doubt do not upload over someone elses image.--Nilfanion (talk) 01:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, sorry then, I'm not particularly familiar with images on Commons. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The same applies with images on WP.--Nilfanion (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Got it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoops; note to self, don't write when tired. How's the image itself? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  12:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Support edit 1 with the comment that significant edits should be uploaded under a new filename, with the actions performed fully noted and a link back to the original file. Durova Charge! 18:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 1 - This is a great photo. High EV and the quality is quite good. (Giligone (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC))
 * Support edit1--Avala (talk) 17:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 1 I tried to stay away from FPC for a while but this is amazing!--Elena85 | Talk to Me | 1800 ''edits!!!' 19:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Though it has a high EV, noise and artifacting prevent me from supporting.  Spencer T♦C 12:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 07:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)