Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Idea leuconoe Weiße Baumnymphe.jpg

Paper Kite (Idea leuconoe)

 * Reason:Nice quality and focus
 * Articles in which this image appears:Idea leuconoe
 * Creator:Pro2

Comment on preference for original or edit 1, please. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Rehratep (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. At this time, the image is used only in a gallery, and so it's encyclopedic value is not clear. I admit the image quality is excellent, but we are not going to be able to promote the image now. Perhaps if the article was a good bit longer, this could be one of two infobox pictures. I am not certain that it would work as the only image used inline, though it certainly seems to be the best image in the article, in technical terms. J Milburn (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * After consideration, I've gone ahead and switched the photos- both have a place in the article, but, as a high quality, compelling shot, this one has earnt its place in the infobox. It seems a shame to refuse a quality image FP status on what is, in many ways, a technicality. As such, due to the high technical quality, compelling composition and high EV, I am happy to support this image. J Milburn (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support--Mbz1 (talk) 04:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support either: Very good shot and sits well in the infobox. I'm sure the article can be expanded, will try to add some content if I find the time.   Mae din \talk 07:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Edit 1 Uploaded
 * Support Edit 1 small but ok --Muhammad (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support either, prefer edit 1. --Avenue (talk) 01:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support either, prefer original. Leaf edges are visually distracting on the crop.  Durova  412 15:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Support either, prefer edit 1. I think I see what Durova is talking about, but I don't find the leaf edges distracting, and the edit provides better focus on the butterfly.  Jujutacular  T · C 08:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 04:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)