Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Iguazu Falls Panorama

Iguazu Falls

 * Reason:It's an amazing falls with a good picture. The picture shows the scope of the falls, doesn't appear to have any artifacts or other problems, and is beautiful.  It isn't fantastically huge, but I do think it is clear enough.  This is the best of the pictures on the Spanish, Portugese and English pages for Iguazu Falls.  I found it because of an old failed FP nomination of a picture of Devil's Throat.
 * Articles this image appears in:Iguazu Falls
 * Creator:Giacomo Miceli


 * Support as nominator &mdash; Enuja 23:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Previous nomination here. -- Tewy  23:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ooops! I've recently started voting (mostly opposes) and I figured it would be good to be constructive, too.  But apparently I didn't do enough research.  How do I get rid of this proposed nomination?  Enuja 23:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There's no need to remove this. You can nominate an image more than once, although it's usually best to wait some time before doing so. But, October was a while ago, and maybe opinions have changed since then. If you want to nominate another image, just be sure to check the bottom of the image page to see what page(s) it's in. -- Tewy  01:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. Blown highlights on the subjects, bottom a little cut off (though possibly unavoidable). Stunning image, but just a few too many minor problems. -- Tewy  23:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral Wow, this is good…would have loved to be there…but there the bottom is cut off, there's that metal thing in the bottom left corner, and general other small things. It's hard to pass up, though.--HereToHelp 00:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * By "that metal thing in the bottom left corner" are you referring to what looks very much like a vine in the bottom left corner? If you look at the bottom right, there is also up-close foliage, so I strongly suspect that the picture was taken from an overlook, and both the vine on the left and the plants on the right are on the sides of the over-look.  Enuja
 * It's the long, thin, cord-like thing in the very bottom-left the goes out to the right and then coils back on itself. It looks unnatural to me. (But I wouldn't change me vote over it.)--HereToHelp 01:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support I love this pic. Colour, grain and focus all look good to me - Adrian Pingstone 15:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Would have been cool if the bottom wasn't cut off... 8thstar 15:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -Per Nom -Nelro 10:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Great subject. composition that everyone doesn't like (bottom cut off) looks first class to me. Actually the angle it's taken from is one of its best aspects. white highlighs on white subjects are fine. -Fcb981 06:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I think we're too harsh here. And if Mohammad would see this, he would regret his idea of paradise with a river, 2 tress and a honeycomb. I keep my support if Diliff is not going to Argentina ;-) --Arad 21:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose as I did back in October of 2006. Poor crop, blown highlights, dark shadows, etc.-Andrew c 22:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Tomer T 10:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support -Breathtaking -Nelro 10:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You are only allowed one vote Pstuart84 Talk 12:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Support- A million reasons why. --Penubag 08:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)penubag
 * Care to name one? Pstuart84 Talk 12:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. I think that picture is difficult to take especially in high clarity. It is strong in color, very viverant, and is high resolution, and great detail.-- Penubag  04:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose just as before, blown highlights. --Janke | Talk 16:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * support- i support this because i believe that there needs to be more panoramic pictures of moving water in the featured picture list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)
 * Please sign in before voting. -- Tewy  19:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Janke. Pstuart84 Talk 13:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 14:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)