Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bengal~Tiger(Panthera tigris tigris) 2~11-29-08.JPG

Bengal Tiger at the American Museum of Natural History

 * Reason:good resolution, striking image, picture taken at a good angle.

Rawey Kased
 * Articles this image appears in:| American Museum of Natural History
 * Creator:WiKiRaW31 (Rawey Kased)


 * Support as nominator --wikiraw31 (talk) 22:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose The background is dark, making the lights, reflections and shadows distracting, especially when the foreign object is the only thing that is flashed. As noticeable, the face has more brightness than the body, and the EV is quite not there. In addition, the stripe shown to the right of the face is distracting.  Zoo Fari  23:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Poor encyclopedic value and photographic quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose for composition, lighting, sharpness. Cool pic but not FP material. Fletcher (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose too poor image.--Caspian blue
 * Support user already !voted, above.  Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC) - well thanks for the feedback guys and criticism, but I took a bunch of pictures at the American Museum of natural history using a Cannon 7.0  mega pixel, so I already assumed I am not going to get the best picture, I really focused on how the object would look at a certain angle. This was also for an assignment. And I'll leave with this being said, I am not a professional photographer with all the lighting gear or whatever it is with the nice expensive cameras. This image is temporary, It can be removed by whoever by next week, thank you. WiKiRaW31 23:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't have to remove this image, even if it isn't fp material. It still makes a good image accompanying an article.  Zoo Fari  03:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please fix the double voting -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Please fix the double voting -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose Interesting picture, but low encyclopedic value. The flash causes too much light in the face, and distracting reflections in the background. Rmacker 1:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Has a number of flaws, but the flash used is the cause of several of them. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 15:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

. --John254 23:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)