Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Clouds over hills.jpg

Clouds over Hills.


Impressive image of high quality. Describes a hill perfectly and also a good weather with Cumulus clouds. It appears in the Hill article and it's taken by: Victor Szalvay


 * Re Nominate and support. - Arad 12:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. A beautiful photo with rich colors, but one that does not well illustrate its stated subject.  SteveHopson 17:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. Per SteveHopson. Nauticashades 18:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Slightly tilted(unless that's just me), not enough focus on the subject, and I'd really like to see landscapes especially in larger size. HeartOfGold 19:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose See my comments for Fields of Gold above. Landscapes need big scale, give us more than 1000 pixels across.  Still, love the photo itself. --Bridgecross 02:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Severely uneven polarization; no clear subject or point of interest; tilted horizon. -- Moondigger 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Tilted - Adrian Pingstone 22:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Subject unclear, and not really big enough to show something as large as a hill HighInBC 02:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose subject matter very weak, its a decent photo though Michaeln36
 * Ineligible -- licensing.  howch e  ng   {chat} 00:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * After email communication with the photographer, he has changed the licensing to cc-by-sa.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Tilted horizon, dark patch in the top left corner for some reason. --WikiSlasher 14:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support This picture has lovely colors, and illustrates well what a hill is (there are few hills where I live so I should know). However, more information about the clouds should be given. This image is comparable to the FPs View from Connor's Hill panorama, and Great Dividing Range. AndonicO 16:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Tilted, no particular subject, heavy polarisation in top left is distracting. A bit feeble as a representation of Hill (although that article seems to be lacking a good illustration). --Yummifruitbat 00:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I think this looks beautiful. I may even adopt it for use as my background. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's certainly better than the default Windows XP background. --WikiSlasher 09:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Somewhat pretty, but not really that encyclopedic. Maybe it could find a more appropriate home in the landscape art article? Staxringold talkcontribs 15:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Good idea, I've done that. Arad 15:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Support Good photo for a hill. Also a good example of cumulus clouds(?). I find it a very good quality too. Don bertone 12:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)