Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Drone flies mating.jpg/tagging


 * Oppose This picture is oversharped and badly postprocessed --Central Powers 21:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please make sure to view the image at full size, and not on the oversharpened image description page. --Fir0002 22:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * User has only 6 edits - four of which are on FPC the other two on his userpage --Fir0002 22:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Can it be that you are handling my contributions in a indiscreet manner? Whats wrong with you? --Central Powers 22:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please calm down, it's standard procedure on en:FPC to avoid "blow in" votes etc. Me being an admin has no relevance to it --Fir0002 07:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No; it is only to help avoid bad-faith single-purpose accounts, sockpuppets, and other nasty things that we are sure you are not but that it's good to be careful about nonetheless. thegreen J      Are you green?  00:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Understand. Opposing a administrator's picture could be a bad faith ? Or a new user which opposes a administrator's picture should be tagged ? I tell you what: For me this indiscreet tagging seems political, making this vote worthless for the next reader. Sorry i disagree with this behaviour. Regards Richard Bartz --Central Powers 01:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I am sure you are acting in perfectly good faith - it's just to discourage other users from acting in bad faith. thegreen J      Are you green?  01:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)