Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Erdfunkstelle Raisting 2.jpg

Erdfunkstelle Raisting, Parabolic antenna
===


 * Reason:Very nice and logging image of a parabolic antenna
 * Articles this image appears in:Deutsche Telekom
 * Creator:--Richard Bartz (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator Richard Bartz (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support--Mbz1 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent technical condition, good composition, high enc. value. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per Slaunger.  crassic ![ talk ] 22:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support very nice. Cat-five - talk 01:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support well done. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I agree with much of the support above, I find the lack of anything within the image that gives a sense of the scale of the building a little disappointing.--Kendosaki (talk) 06:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The red entrance door gives a good scale mark. Otherwise a version like this would be to distracting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The red entrance door gives a good scale mark. Otherwise a version like this would be to distracting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Shows exactly what it is - perfectly placed within the frame. The pattern made by the track (fortuitously or planned?) makes an excellent base shape to support the bowl - even the little barriers help. The only problem is that the brightness within the bowl loses the clarity of the bits and pieces inside. Motmit (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Spencer  T♦C 17:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 09:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Reason:Very nice and logging image of a parabolic antenna
 * Articles this image appears in:Deutsche Telekom
 * Creator:--Richard Bartz (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Support as nominator Richard Bartz (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support--Mbz1 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent technical condition, good composition, high enc. value. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per Slaunger.  crassic ![ talk ] 22:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support very nice. Cat-five - talk 01:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support well done. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I agree with much of the support above, I find the lack of anything within the image that gives a sense of the scale of the building a little disappointing.--Kendosaki (talk) 06:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The red entrance door gives a good scale mark. Otherwise a version like this would be to distracting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The red entrance door gives a good scale mark. Otherwise a version like this would be to distracting. --Richard Bartz (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Support Shows exactly what it is - perfectly placed within the frame. The pattern made by the track (fortuitously or planned?) makes an excellent base shape to support the bowl - even the little barriers help. The only problem is that the brightness within the bowl loses the clarity of the bits and pieces inside. Motmit (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Spencer  T♦C 17:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 09:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)