Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hummingbird Hawk-moth.jpg

Hummingbird Hawk-moth


Appears in : Hummingbird Hawk-moth

]] 10:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC) MER-C 11:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Self Nom. --Ba'Gamnan 17:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - We already have a Featured Picture of this species: Image:IC Macroglossum stellatarum1 NR.jpg, which IMO is more appealing. The composition of this one leaves too much dead space on the 'wrong' side of the subject. It's a reasonable shot, but not featured-quality. --YFB ¿  16:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, beautiful image of course, but I agree with YFB's opinion of the other featured image. I don't think we need two for the same species, and the composition of the other is probably superior. -- Phoenix2  (talk, review) 18:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I don't think it should matter whether there is another featured picture of this species or not, personally I think this is more encyclopedic than the other one as it is a clear profile shot. I also prefer the colours in this shot. Terri G 09:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Great shot. Not only does this image offer a great profile shot with better flower colors, nowhere do the FP requirements say we can't have multiple FPs on the same subject. In fact we have multiple FPs of sunsets for example. I'm sure someone else can come up with a better example to compare to. - Mgm|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic| (talk)
 * Support Per Mgm Bewareofdog 23:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Over-sharpened or something, strong halos around feet & antennae. Also too loosely cropped for good enc. --Janke | Talk 05:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)