Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Japanese Squirrel.jpg

Japanese Squirrel

 * Reason:technical quality, cuteness (oh, no!)
 * Articles this image appears in:Japanese Squirrel
 * Creator:Ma2bara


 * Support as nominator Samsara (talk • contribs) 08:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Edit 2 or Edit 3 Lovely scene and technical quality is pretty good - though I wish it were taken at a smaller aperture (to be fair I'd guess the lighting didn't permit). --Fir0002 08:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support any of the edits. Lovely colors. CillaИ &diams; XC 23:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 3 (I've changed the caption). Lovely depiction but the last edit seems the best - Peripitus (Talk) 00:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose all versions. Limited DOF can not be fixed. Squirrels are easy targets (with a bit of practice). Have another go. Lycaon (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ouch, that's a bit harsh. Increased DoF is inevitable with the smaller chips in compact cameras, which I'd venture this was shot with. Unless we effectively exclude all but DSLR wildlife shots (based on this one, I wouldn't) we have to make some allowance for the absence of thousand-dollar optics. Personally, I really don't think it looks "worse", just different to the classic bokeh-smoothed BG, which just isn't obligatory in all cases. I'd further speculate this was shot wide-open, full telephoto, so the chances of the same photographer improving on that aspect of it would be slim to none. --mikaultalk 01:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You may find it difficult to communicate with the photographer - unless you can write Japanese. -- Danverlanche (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 分野の深さは限られている. それは変わることができない. リスは容易なターゲットである(僅かな練習と) . 別のものを行ってもらいなさい :-)). Just a pity that he/she is not very active (last activity was 21:20, 1 August 2007). Lycaon (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support edit 3 -- ZeWrestler  Talk 01:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 04:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)