Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Long Billed Corella Beak.jpg

Long Billed Corella Beak

 * Reason:Great quality. Already successfully nominated a picture of the whole bird, however this one serves a different purpose, demonstrating beak structure. This image also provides greater detail for the most important part of the bird for identification purposes.
 * Articles this image appears in:Beak, Long-billed Corella
 * Creator:Noodle snacks


 * Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support It's a great pic, but is it my eyes (from the white), or are the feathers south-west of his eye VERY blurry? Dengero (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment existing FP of exactly the same subject, by same creator. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolute Oppose This picture is already an fp. Rj1020 (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose existing FP covers the apparent subject/focus of this image adequately already. Mfield (talk) 04:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - a crop of a FP is not a new FP. pschemp | talk 13:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose I don't think it's a crop, but still. Fletcher (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose since its a crop of another FP. TALKIN   PIE EATER   REVIEW ME  16:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The other FP already does a very good job of illustrating this. Clegs (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. FWIW and in the interests of fairness, this is neither an existing FP nor a crop of the existing FP, even if it is clearly taken at the same time and is almost certainly the same bird. --jjron (talk) 09:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 12:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)