Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Redeye cicada02.jpg

Redeye

 * Reason:High quality image of a distinctive Australian Cicada
 * Articles this image appears in:Psaltoda moerens and Cicada
 * Creator:Fir0002


 * Support as nominator --Fir0002 05:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support original - EV and quality are good. I like the original because the view shows more of the insect rather just from one direction (what we engineers like to call isometric versus plan view). Isometric typically offers a better overall viewing in my line o' work. ~ Wadester16 (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support original. Good sharpness and DOF on this macro, and the exposure seems about right, showing the shiny wings without any major blown highlights. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 06:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support for quality and EV. Fletcher (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Original They are reasonably sharp and so on but I don't however think the lighting is ideal. Due to the relatively large size of the subject (110-120mm wingspan) the light is pretty much on-axis and resultantly not particularly pleasing. The alternate in particular has that direct on axis flash look to it due to the glossy leaves. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

--Noodle snacks (talk) 10:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)